Sunday, 22 June 2025

Rights of Investors Against Builders for Non-Delivery of Premises in India

 Investing in real estate is often one of the most significant financial commitments individuals make. However, when a builder fails to deliver the premises as per the agreed terms, specifications, or timelines, investors find themselves in a distressing situation. Fortunately, Indian laws provide various legal remedies to protect the rights of allottees and investors. This blog explores these rights, relevant legal provisions, and landmark case laws that establish and reinforce the legal safeguards available to investors.

 1. Right to Refund with Interest

Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), the primary legislation regulating real estate transactions in India, investors have a statutory right to seek full refund along with interest for the period of delay or breach.

Legal Provisions & Case Law:

·         Section 18 of RERA empowers allottees to file complaints with the State Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) if the promoter fails to complete or give possession as per the agreement.

 

·         In Arun Singh v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court emphasized that RERA aims to protect homebuyers’ rights and ensure timely delivery, making refunds with interest a statutory entitlement.

 

2. Right to Compensation

Investors can claim compensation for any losses caused due to delays, deficiencies in construction, or deviations from the agreed specifications.

Legal Precedent:

·         The Supreme Court in the case of P. C. Pande v. Union of India (2019) highlighted that builders must compensate buyers for loss of time and inconvenience caused due to breach of contractual obligations.

 

3. Right to Possession

If construction is finished but possession is unduly delayed, the allottee can demand immediate possession through legal channels.

Legal Recourse:

·         Under Section 18 of RERA, the authority can direct the builder to deliver possession.

·         The landmark case of K. Raheja Constructions Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi (2018) confirmed that delay in possession is a violation of statutory rights, and courts can direct builders to hand over possession promptly.

 

4. Filing Complaint under RERA

Investors have the right to file complaints before the respective State RERA Authority for any non-compliance, including failure to deliver possession, non-adherence to approved plans, or other breaches.

Legal Framework:

·         RERA mandates transparent grievance redressal mechanisms, with Section 31 providing for filing complaints.

 

5. Rights under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 complements RERA by providing civil remedies for deficiency in service or unfair trade practices by builders.

Key Point:

·         Investors can approach the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for relief, including damages for mental agony and harassment.

Case Law:

·         In K.K. Verma v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court highlighted that consumers’ rights include protection against unfair trade practices, which applies to real estate transactions.

 

6. Right to Approach NCLT (Insolvency Proceedings)

If the builder defaults significantly and the amount paid is substantial, investors can initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), treating the builder as a corporate debtor.

Legal Precedent:

·         The NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) has admitted insolvency petitions filed by homebuyers against defaulting builders, such as in Jaypee Infratech Ltd. case (2019), to ensure project completion and safeguard investors’ interests.

 

7. Right to Seek Specific Performance

Investors can seek specific performance of the builder-buyer agreement through civil courts if the builder refuses to fulfill contractual obligations.

Legal Authority:

·         Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, permits courts to order specific performance of contractual obligations, reinforced by Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

 

8. Damages for Mental Harassment & Legal Harassment

Courts recognize that long delays and fraudulent conduct cause mental agony. Therefore, courts or consumer forums may award damages for harassment and mental distress.

Landmark Case:

·         In Union of India v. S. R. Chaudhary (2014), the Supreme Court held that damages for mental harassment are permissible when a party suffers due to negligence or unfair conduct.

 

Conclusion

The legal landscape in India provides a robust framework to protect the rights of investors and allottees against builder defaults. Laws like RERA, the Consumer Protection Act, and the IBC collectively offer avenues for refunds, compensation, possession, and even insolvency proceedings against defaulting builders. However, investors should remain vigilant, document all transactions, and seek legal counsel promptly when their rights are infringed.

No comments:

Post a Comment