Sunday, 6 March 2016
Tribunal faced strong criticism for not following the judgment
Tribunal faced strong criticism for not following the judgment
• It was held by High Court that all authorities within the State are bound to follow its order unless the same is stayed or set aside by the apex court or larger bench take a different view. If the Tribunal doesn't follow this discipline, it would result in uncertainty of the law and confusion among the taxpayers as to what are their obligations under the Act. Besides opening the gates for arbitrary action in the administration of law, as each authority would then decide disregarding the binding precedents leading to complete chaos and anarchy in the administration of law. Hence, it is not open to the Tribunal to disregard the binding decisions of this Court.
[2016] 67 taxmann.com 42 (Bombay)
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HDFC Bank Ltd.
v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -2(3), Mumbai
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Why Every Hospital Should Start Preparing for DPDP Compliance
Your hospital may be treating patients every day — but how securely is it handling their personal data? Hospitals collect and process a l...
-
INTRODUCTION OF NEW SYLLABUS AND REVISION IN REGISTRATION FEE AND OTHER FEES PAYABLE BY THE STUDENTS W.E.F. 1ST FEBRUARY, 2013 EFFECTIVE DA...
-
Decoding Loan-to-Equity Conversions: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Procedures and ROC Compliance in India (with Case Laws) In the intri...
-
BREAKING NEWS: The new syllabus for CS Executive Programme w.e.f. February 1, 2013 and the CS Professional Programme w.e.f. September 1, ...
