Sunday, 6 March 2016
Tribunal faced strong criticism for not following the judgment
Tribunal faced strong criticism for not following the judgment
• It was held by High Court that all authorities within the State are bound to follow its order unless the same is stayed or set aside by the apex court or larger bench take a different view. If the Tribunal doesn't follow this discipline, it would result in uncertainty of the law and confusion among the taxpayers as to what are their obligations under the Act. Besides opening the gates for arbitrary action in the administration of law, as each authority would then decide disregarding the binding precedents leading to complete chaos and anarchy in the administration of law. Hence, it is not open to the Tribunal to disregard the binding decisions of this Court.
[2016] 67 taxmann.com 42 (Bombay)
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HDFC Bank Ltd.
v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -2(3), Mumbai
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Public Advisory & Call for Collective Action Against Alleged Financial Misconduct by CXMeta
Public Advisory & Call for Collective Action Against Alleged Financial Misconduct by CXMeta z, World Trade Center 23nd Floor, Unit No....
-
Major Dividends to Be Declared in June 2025 (Indian Market) Below is a list of prominent Indian companies that have announced dividend...
-
New Income Tax Bill 2025: Check Key Changes and Features India’s Income Tax Bill 2025 , tabled in Parliament on August 11, 2025 , aims t...
-
Form 15H is a self-declaration form submitted by resident senior citizens (individuals aged 60 years or more) to banks and other financial...
